Episode 001: Invest Like a Business Owner
In this episode, you’ll learn:
- Why some business owners often become better investors through firsthand experience with risk, volatility, and capital allocation;
- The blind spots business owners have when they enter the world of investing;
- Why you might shift your attitude toward dividends after experiencing firsthand how brutal capitalism is;
- The daily habits that help David stay grounded, including exercise, reading, and reflection;
- A different take on “you are the average of the five people you spend the most time with”—and the tradeoffs of seeking higher-caliber peers;
- Why financial independence raises deeper questions about purpose, relationships, and long-term alignment in life and work; and
- When (and how) to go into business with friends: lessons from real stories about incentives, equity splits, and mutual expectations.
Transcript
Stig Brodersen: In today’s episode, I’m having a conversation with our recurring guest, David Fagan, a seasoned entrepreneur, thoughtful investor, and someone I’m fortunate to call a close friend. In this discussion, we examine the intersection between being a business owner and public market investing.
Stig Brodersen: We explore how operating a company influences one’s views on portfolio concentration, risk, dividends, and management quality, and how those insights can both be an asset and a liability in public equities. Then we talk about what happens after you reach financial independence and how finding your why becomes the next big challenge.
Intro: Since 2014 and through more than 180 million downloads, we’ve studied the financial markets and read the books that influenced self-made billionaires the most. We keep you informed and prepared for the unexpected. Now for your host Stig Brodersen.
Stig Brodersen: You are listening to The Investor’s Podcast. I’m your host Stig Brodersen, and I am joined by David Fagan today. And some of you might know David from episode 639, where he covered Buffett’s favorite investment book together with Clay, others as a thought leader of business. And to me he’s all of that. But first and foremost, he’s just my friend David. So David, how are you today?
David Fagan: I’m doing great. Thank you for having me on today, Stig.
Stig Brodersen: You bet. And let’s just dive right into the first segment here, because David, here on the show, as you know, we discuss and interact with a lot of investors, and in this episode we want to turn the tables and focus on investing, but from the perspective of being a businessman or businesswoman, and you know, I can’t help myself but say the Buffett’s family just said, I’m a better businessman because I’m an investor and I’m a better investor because I’m a businessman.
Stig Brodersen: And so that is our first segment here. And you know, I like to think that we use the same part of the brain whenever it comes to investing, whenever it comes to business, which generally is to our advantage as businessmen, but probably sometimes not. We’re going to talk a bit more about that. And we have a lot of these conversations here in our mastermind community, and I kind of felt we should open it up here to the entire TIP community because.
Stig Brodersen: One thing I very much appreciate about our community is that there’s a lot of business owners in the community, and I really hope this doesn’t come across as if you don’t own your own business, it’s you’re not a good investor or anything like that. That’s the very opposite. But I think I want to mention is that there’s a lot of investing pundits out there and most often haven’t run their own business.
Stig Brodersen: And I would argue that once you have the opportunity to do that, you might see investing a little bit differently. And then at the same time, because I know there are a lot of businesspeople out there who run their own business in the audience, you probably also need to unlearn a thing or two. If you run your own business and you’re like, oh my God, I’m good at this.
Stig Brodersen: I need to be good at investing. Because Buffett says that, you know, investing is best for the most business. Like, and then you realize that perhaps your skillset isn’t that great because you have other disadvantages. So anyways, a few observations I wanted to make here before I throw over to you. I think that.
Stig Brodersen: I’ve noticed that a lot of people look at business owners and they say, Ooh, that sounds risky. And then being on the other side of the table, I would say that knowing a lot of entrepreneurs, they do everything they can to minimize risk. And I think a lot of people would argue they probably take less risk by own their own business.
Stig Brodersen: Also, because a lot of business owners, especially in the beginning before you know, the business has been spinning off cash. You know, you can argue that you have 90 plus, 99% of your net worth in one asset. So I think that there’s probably an element of a lot of business owners, they’re quite comfortable about having a concentrated portfolio because you know, if they have 10 stocks, they’re like, oh my God, that’s amazing.
Stig Brodersen: I used to have one asset now I have 10. Like I’m so diversified. Also, add to that, I would say that as business owners we also don’t get a quote on our business and we used to see the volatility of business probably from the inside a little bit differently. And then if I turn the table and then I look at people that what it used to be, you know, in my case, and so many other business owners, they start often start as employees collecting a salary.
Stig Brodersen: And many tend to invest in index funds. And I don’t think I, I don’t want to make it as simplistic as saying, oh, if you’re a businessman, a business owner, you have a more concentrated portfolio. And if you collect the salaries or you do this fund I know there is a lot of things in between, so please don’t get me wrong, but I think, you know, one observation is this famous Best Buy in the study that talks about how returns primarily come from 4% of stocks, which is just incredible, right?
Stig Brodersen: So many people would interpret that and then would say, that is so difficult to find those 4%. So why not just buy an index? And then perhaps business owners who’ve been successful, they also know how difficult it is to start up their own business and that have gone well. So they’re thinking. Well then, my job is to go out and find those 4%.
Stig Brodersen: You know, why wouldn’t I do that? Apparently, that’s where all the returns are. And so I think I want to throw over to you here, David. What advantages and disadvantages do you think that we as small business owners perhaps have in investing in public markets? David Fagan: Yeah. Buffett’s quote on being a better investor and businessman, because he does both, to me, just frames an intense career of focus and continuous learning, which of course we all know.
David Fagan: I mean, whether you run your own, operate a business, or you’re investing in the markets, it doesn’t matter which side you come from first, whether it’s entrepreneurship or investing, understanding costs, margins, competitive advantage, these are universal, right? So if you can apply your knowledge across both silos, that can give you a huge advantage, right?
David Fagan: And so. I think I’ll start by answering your question about the advantages and disadvantages from the perspective of someone who started out as an entrepreneur first and then became an investor. cause naturally that’s been my experience stake. So, you know, when you start out as an entrepreneur, you learn some really hard lessons.
David Fagan: I mean, and those lessons can kind of battle test you a little bit for your investing career later. And both business and investing your temperament really matters. And so if you can learn patience, that’s going to really help you as an investor. And you know, going through some challenging times in business can help you prepare for maybe the fortitude you need to kind of withstand significant draw down in the market or an individual holding that you had that kind of went sideways a little bit.
David Fagan: So, you know, I guess when I think back to some of my more stressful times in my business career. Whether I was dealing with tax auditor or being dead wrong on a segment that I was allocating capital to or maybe even having to let go of employees. I mean, that’s never a good day. Those experiences for me were far more challenging than seeing what ends up being a temporary decline of maybe 15 or 20% in my portfolio.
David Fagan: So, you know, we learn so much from our mistakes. So how wonderful really is it to be able to learn those lessons as an entrepreneur, to kind of develop the grit you need to be an investor. You know, ’cause I mean, at some point you’re going to get tested and to be able to have some of that, those lessons to carry you through in those moments are wonderful.
David Fagan: You know, and couple thoughts too, partly to your point on concentration, being comfortable with fewer holdings because you know your business so well. Being a business owner teaches you the importance of longevity. I mean, I. I think most business owners would understand this. And I mean, you’d rarely see a 30 5-year-old full of energy and scaling their business, but also on the same time thinking every quarter about selling their equity.
David Fagan: I mean, that just doesn’t happen, right? And so, you know, they’re focused on building something long lasting and that mindset, you know, the mindset of kind of inaction, that can become an advantage too. You know, learning from, you know, your silo as an entrepreneur and rolling into investments. So, you know, just like, you know, if you own your own business, it might have taken you years to scale it.
David Fagan: And you know, the hidden ingredient really can be endurance sometimes. And so if we can give that same patience and appreciation to our public equity investments, I mean, you’re giving yourself a lot of breathing room there. So. Yeah, and I guess too, if I actually flip it backwards and I think, okay, well what can we learn on the investor silo that we can kind of move into the entrepreneurial silo?
David Fagan: I mean, you know, one of the biggest advantages we have as investors today is access to so much information. And, you know, we can study on companies how they operate and what makes ’em successful and what pitfalls to avoid. And you know, we often talk about the power of cloning so, so much. And of course William wrote this about Mohnish’s ability to clone so intelligently in his book.
David Fagan: I mean, imagine if you’re running a trucking and transportation company, you know, how great is it to be able to study companies like Old Dominion or TFI International? I mean, you can read their investor presentations, study their financials, you can pick up. Clues on, you know, what they’re doing and how you can apply that to your own business.
David Fagan: And, you know, as you know, stage, I run a small accounting firm here in Canada. And while I’m not an investor in Kelly and Partners, that’s a small public company out of Australia, they, I think they’re actually moving into the US but they’re in the accounting world. I mean, I do study them. I look at their deal flow, how they acquire firms, how they manage margins.
David Fagan: And I mean, it gives me great insights that I can reflect on and kind of input it back into what we’re trying to do here. So it’s, you know, being able to learn from both sides is just wonderful. Right. And so, you know, Stig, I’m curious, you know, what have you learned from studying companies maybe like Spotify that’s helped you kind of grow in your podcast business? I mean, has that been something you’ve been able to kind of correlate a little bit?
Stig Brodersen: Yeah, definitely. And if I was really smart. I would learn from other people’s mistakes and what other people learned, and I wouldn’t have to, you know, grow wise out of pain and figure it out myself. I remember it might have been 10 years ago, eight years ago, something like that, and I listened to this presentation that Reid Hoffman, that the co-founder of LinkedIn, and I think that even that recording was like 10 years old at the time.
Stig Brodersen: And you talked about the importance of distribution. Like, it wasn’t about having a great idea or even to some extent execute on, on, on that idea. It was like, if you have distribution, that’s really where the value is. And I remember it, it really was something that stuck with me ever since. But then to your question about Spotify, it’s almost like you have to experience it yourself, or perhaps if you’re not as slow learner as I am, you have to like, you have to experience the power of having the platform and you know, there’s.
Stig Brodersen: There’s a lot of things that, you know, this podcast and this podcast network is not, but you know, it’s like, but you have so and so many people coming to the platform and once you have the platform, you can do other things. And you, you see that with Spotify, for example. So, you know, they started in music and then they got hundreds of millions of people on the platform and then they said, okay, you know, let’s do podcasting.
Stig Brodersen: Then they completely changed their podcasting sector, which is also one of the reasons why I invested in them in the first place. ’cause I saw what was going on and I could see why there would be the industry standard. And then they said, well, we have all those, these people, let’s set up a new vertical.
Stig Brodersen: Okay, let’s do audiobooks. Sort of sense. You have music, you have podcasts, your audiobook, and now you know they’re doing all these tests with education and they learned that through actually from some of the creators that they have because creators are so used to put, you know, different things behind the pay.
Stig Brodersen: You can just think of all the things that a platform like Spotify can do, even though I came for the podcast, but then you see what’s going on. And so I think you can learn a lot from that. And I remember whenever we had Bill Miller on the show, like, he’s been on show multiple times, but I think it might be the first time we had him on what he talked about.
Stig Brodersen: There were like two or three key variables. You need to figure out who the best is and then you know, the rest is more or less noise. I’m completely paraphrasing what you’re saying here, but you, that is how I remember it. And to me, like I, I’ve been invested in Spotify and multiple times and then you are like, huh, okay.
Stig Brodersen: I feel I sort of understand the podcast business, I feel I also understand Spotify. And then it’s just like it stuck with me like that. Bill Miller quote that I completely butchered, but I talked on the show about like figuring out what that is and I think to some extent I’m not saying that, you know, I’m the only person in the world who knows the key metrics of Spotify.
Stig Brodersen: I think it, it’s out there in the, in public space. But I think it’s very interesting once you look at this from a perspective of a business owner, it’s just it feels a little bit different. Whereas whenever I started, I had more like the analyst cab on where I was like, okay, I’m going to track revenue and I’m going to check, you know, track profits and I guess that’s what it’s all about.
Stig Brodersen: And you’re like, well, there’s so many of those other metrics that’s just not in the, in gap Accounting is so.
David Fagan: I mean, it’s so nice to be able to pick up cues from other companies to be able to imply into your own business and yeah, it’s a lot less expensive to learn from other people’s mistakes. To pick up on something you had mentioned earlier, Stig, about actually unlearning from both worlds.
David Fagan: I think that’s something that we should probably talk about too. ’cause you know, one of the hardest things to unlearn, kind of in what I’ve thought about it from merging both worlds of entrepreneurship and public company investing is action. And you know, entrepreneurship in many ways is driven by action.
David Fagan: You know, it’s like the hustle and execution and sometimes you have to pivot really quickly to solve problems. And you know, like you’re launching new projects and sometimes you’re kind of launching these projects on a whim as well, right? And under pressure. And you know, that’s almost the opposite wiring that you want for successful long-term investing.
David Fagan: You know, as Munger said it best, you know, the big money is not in buying and selling, but in the waiting. Right? And so. When you move into investing, you’re making a different kind of decision. You’re placing your capital with businesses and you’re outsourcing the execution of their CEOs and their management teams, right?
David Fagan: And so now your job as an investor is to be patient and resist the urge to do something. And you know, for someone who’s hustled is hired as an entrepreneur, has done or has to do, that’s tough sometimes. And it actually goes against your instincts. That’s one thing. And then the other thing I would say you have to kind of unlearn or maybe to manage when you’re kind of merging both worlds is the risk mindset.
David Fagan: And you know, entrepreneurs are often taking risk and you should, right? Like sometimes you got to spend money on projects that may not work out that you know, that’s actually a great thing. Sometimes you got to experiment and you got to throw mud against the wall and see what happens. But that risk taking instinct doesn’t always translate in well into public market investing.
David Fagan: So if you carry that same appetite for risks into your investing world, it could potentially backfire. I mean, there’s no better example than that, than using really too much margin or leverage in public company investing, right? So you’ve got to be mindful to adapt there. You know, I would say the worlds of kind of business ownership and investing complement each other, but you’ve just got to be really mindful to adapt your instincts.
Stig Brodersen: So David, one, one thing I would like to add is that, you know, from speaking with successful business people daily, I think that whether you come from perspective being a business owner, just you are in business you really learn and have this deep respect for how fragile all businesses are. And to your point about, you know, taking risks and it’s actually very risky not to take risk, even though it probably sounds counterintuitive.
Stig Brodersen: And so these models that we have, and I think it’s perfectly fine if you extrapolate your revenue and your, you know, earnings per share so, or whatnot. Like, you have an idea of what’s going to happen. But of course the world isn’t that kind. And I’m sure the people who prepare those monologue also know that, you know, the world is just very choppy.
Stig Brodersen: It doesn’t go up in a straight line. Carnegie had this wonderful principle of put all your eggs in one basket, then watch the basket carefully. And I don’t want this to sound like an endorsement of just on one stock. That’s not at all what I’m saying, but I do think that there was something to be said about watching your basket very carefully.
Stig Brodersen: And so I think as business owners, you probably have this assess need, I probably shouldn’t say we as business owners ’cause I kind of feel like I’ll be dragging you down, David, to my level. So I could probably just speak to myself, but I think some business owners definitely in, in my case, I think that, you know, having that.
Stig Brodersen: Being used to having control, you know, and then go into public markets where you don’t have any control. At least with the amount of money that I’m moving around. It is not like Buffett is calling me, asking me for directions for, to Holloway or anything like that. I’m sure if you have a lot of money and you invest in smaller companies, it might be different, but you don’t have any control in public markets.
Stig Brodersen: And I find that to be liberating and frustrating at the same time. So it’s liberating because you know that having control is time consuming and the buck stops with you. And that can sometimes be annoying. But then at the same time, the wonderful thing about the buck stops with you is that you have control and that all of a sudden you are watching from the sideline and you see the CEO do something ridiculous.
Stig Brodersen: You’re like, yeah, you can sell, but perhaps the market also thinks it’s ridiculous and it just tanked 20%. And you’re like, should I take that loss? Or is it temporary? Or like, it’s one of those things where you just like, yeah, that, that’s, you know, hit the game, not the player type of thing. So., I think there’s an element of that.
Stig Brodersen: And the other thing I would also say is that I feel sometimes that people who have a, let’s call a conventional corporate job, sometimes I feel they have different advantages because from running my own business, I think I sometimes have two high standards whenever it comes to other, to management look, you know, in, in various list of companies of how they should behave.
Stig Brodersen: And the irony is that whenever I meet, you know, different community members or whatnot, I always, I can’t help myself, but like crisp them about the business they’re in. So regardless of what kind of line of business they’re in I’m just curious about business models and, you know, and then many of them are telling me, oh no, you shouldn’t invest in this business.
Stig Brodersen: Like, management is terrible. This is terrible. And so I sometimes feel like people with a corporate job have a higher tolerance for poor management because they’ve seen. Companies thrive, even with poor management. So sometimes it’s just easier for them to pull the trigger, whereas I sometimes feel like I’m just way too lazy whenever it comes to that because I set very high standards whenever it comes to management in integrity.
Stig Brodersen: And then, you know, sometimes you still get disappointed. I want to throw to you again here David.
David Fagan: Yeah. I mean, when you think about your own small business, you have something really powerful. It’s called perfect information, right? I mean, you know everything, you know your company’s strengths, weaknesses and the imperfections, right?
David Fagan: And you know, the rhythms that it takes to kind of run the day to day. But when you know, you invest in public companies, you’re outsourcing so much and you don’t have perfect information, honestly, stake that. Maybe that’s a good thing. If you knew every flaw of a business you wanted to invest in, you could probably easily talk yourself out of investing in it.
David Fagan: You know, I mean. I live in a world of small businesses where I think it’s safe to say that no company worth five to $10 million, whatever, say they’ve got a competitive advantage, is defined by a moat. You know, even looking at some of the largest companies in the world, I still find myself falling back and asking the question like, are they executing right?
David Fagan: And you know, I think that’s something you really appreciate as a business owner studying public companies is maybe the unsexy idea that just showing up every day and performing and simply executing on your business plan is good, right? And you know, it’s definitely something that you can see when you do run your own business and you can kind of identify that with other companies.
David Fagan: And you do know all the information with respect to your own company, right? And so I think those are two kind of important things to consider. And maybe the last thing that I want to mention about merging kind of both worlds of investing in business. Is the idea that I think it’s important for business owners to think about, especially when it comes to investing in the public markets, is how conservative you might want to be with your basket of investments.
David Fagan: And, you know, this might be slightly off topic a little bit, but you know, oftentimes when you think about it, you know, when you’re running and scaling a private business, you’re already taking on pretty meaningful risks on the private equity side. I mean, you’re investing capital, you’re hiring people, you’re assessing new markets, and you know, oftentimes you’re carrying debt when you’re doing this, especially if you’re buying other companies out to scale.
David Fagan: And, you know, given that reality, you might want to factor in how aggressively you invest your free cash flows in the public market when you’re contemplating the risk that you’re taking on your private equity side. So, you know, if you’re operating a business and you’re making a 20 to 25% what I’d call a working.
David Fagan: Working investment type return, you don’t really need to go out in the public market and hit home runs to do really well. You know, honestly, for a lot of business owners who don’t want to do the deep company by company work and the deep dive to kind of get into the nitty gritty, you know, you could just have a simple, steady approach.
David Fagan: I mean, if you can defer your taxes on active business income, invest those free cash flows into, say, a low cost index fund with low turnover and minimal tax distributions, I mean, that can be an incredibly powerful path and wealth creation just by itself. Right? And you know, as Munger said, you know, the first rule of compounding is don’t interrupt it unnecessarily.
David Fagan: So if you can just let that compounding engine run both inside your business and inside your public investments, I mean, you don’t have to make it complicated. You just have to kind of let time do its thing sometimes, right? And so I think, you know, you’ve got to incorporate that a little bit as well.
Stig Brodersen: David, I think another angle I wanted to include here is dividends. I want to say that it’s a topic that’s divisive. I don’t think it is. I think more or less everyone disagrees with me, so it’s probably not divisive at all. But I’ve increasingly starting to like companies paying dividends and I couldn’t understand it at all before.
Stig Brodersen: And generally whenever I see different writeups, you know, I would read a Substack or something to that and generally there is a selection bias and I hope this comes across the right way. A lot of people who do Substack, you know, they’re up and comers and, you know, they might not have a huge net worth, but like very smart and they want to find compounders and they love doing stock research and all of that is, is wonderful.
Stig Brodersen: There’s a lot of great research out there. Then they don’t really understand why a company would pay out dividends and feel like it’s hurting shareholders. And very often they’re right. So I should also say that. But you know, the premise here for this segment is this premise of, you know, investing is best done when it’s most businesslike, businessman, investor, and vice versa.
Stig Brodersen: And so I think I, I see dividends a little bit differently after I have run my own business for some time. And I want, wanted to provide a few different examples. I’ve tried accumulating cash in the business of TIP and I’ve realized whenever I do that, I do stupid things because I don’t know, it might be a stick thing and hopefully other managers are doing a better job of that.
Stig Brodersen: But sometimes whenever you have too much cash laying around, you do stupid stuff. And so, and like you would start bad projects, for example. And so whenever you take out cash from a bank account, you impose a bit more. Fiscal discipline on yourself. I mean, I still make plenty of bad decisions even whenever we have less cash, but you think about it a little bit differently.
Stig Brodersen: And so I think that’s part of it. And then there’s another part of it where whenever you see enough projects fail, and you see how brutal capitalism is, you to get paid while you wait and while you own an asset. And so if you have, let’s say that you that you have a founder, and it might be a listed company now the founder might own, I don’t know, let’s just say 20% of the company that stays worth a hundred million dollars and let’s not talk about different share classes.
Stig Brodersen: But if you have the founder and perhaps also CEO and chairman, which you can even if you only have a 20% depending on the bylaws and so on and so forth, from his perspective, well, perhaps it’s nice to have a two or 3% dividend yield. You might be thinking there as a budding your stock investor, like, why doesn’t he buy back shares?
Stig Brodersen: It’s like, yeah, you know, no one’s crazy. Perhaps he doesn’t optimize for your shareholder yield, but you know, if you, if all of your money is in a hundred million dollars listed equities, and you, and also remember you as a budding stock analyst, you also hate whenever they sell stock. So you don’t want him to sell stock.
Stig Brodersen: And then he’s like, you also don’t want him to take a salary because you know, that’s not the way to do it. We learn from Warren Buffett not more than a hundred thousand dollars. And you also don’t want him to give himself stock options. You don’t want any of that. Okay, great. But then he has a, let’s call it 2% yield.
Stig Brodersen: It’s $2 million pre-tax. And of course $2 million is a lot of money pre-tax. But also keep in mind that he has a hundred percent of his net worth in the stock. So if he wants to diversify a little, he probably also want to enjoy life a little. He might have four kids. He, so it sort of makes sense from that standpoint why you might do that.
Stig Brodersen: Plus, you know, the idea of reinvesting in new projects always makes sense whenever you’re selling in an Excel sheet, but whenever you run your business, you learn that you don’t always have projects for that extra cash. Like, and sometimes you meet or you might have projects, but you don’t have the right people on the team to take on those projects or like, it doesn’t really fit with the culture you want to have.
Stig Brodersen: And like there’s, so, I don’t know I guess this is just my way of saying that, yes, there’s a lot of corrupt management out there and yes, a lot of ’em are probably self-serving. But whenever you are sort of like on the other side of it, you just, you sometimes look at those decisions of capital allocation a little bit differently from the other side of being a stock investor.
David Fagan: No, having a little bit of margin of safety on the manager’s capital allocation strategy. I mean, that can definitely be well over time. So, yeah, I mean, oftentimes when I’m thinking about dividends as a Canadian who runs a small business corporation, I’m always getting into the weeds with taxes on it and stuff.
David Fagan: I mean, that’s a conversation for another day. There’s so many listeners in different jurisdictions and stuff, but tax kind of factors into a big, big part of that conversation as well.
Stig Brodersen: Yeah, that’s a good point. David and that is very often, you know, why we as investors don’t want to save dividends.
Stig Brodersen: So it, again it really depends on how you’re being taxed. David, I wanted to jump to the second segment here about successful habits. And I know that. You run a very successful business. And I know that you mentioned on one of the calls we have in our mastermind community that you like to exercise and you like to read the first hour of, do I say every day?
Stig Brodersen: I wish I had that discipline. Could you talk more about your habits? It’s very inspiring.
David Fagan: Yeah, sure. So yeah, within our TIP mastermind community, I’ve run some accountability calls quarterly over the last year and a half. So a few of these things I’ve shared with everyone. I mean, we just finished talking about how your experience as a business owner can shape you as an investor and vice versa.
David Fagan: And as a business owner executive, you know how much time and energy and attention it takes to move a company forward. I mean, you’re systematizing change and you’re adopting best practices. And you know, that takes a lot of discipline to do. And honestly, that’s how I approach my own personal habits. You know, I’m constantly trying to.
David Fagan: Adopt best practices and you know, ones that work for me and o and only for me. I mean, you recently did an episode Stig about advice you’d give your 20-year-old self. And it made me really reflect because when I was in my twenties, I probably completely took for granted some of the good habits that I already had.
David Fagan: You know, my, my wife and I, we’ve always put a high priority on health and wellness, and that’s just kind of what we did. And, you know, we weren’t we were always being active and eating healthy and stuff, right. And so fast forward into my mid-forties, and I’ve come to really appreciate that those habits and maybe the personal algorithms that I’ve developed, you know, they’re, they’ve allowed me to produce very consistent in my life, right?
David Fagan: And so, you know, I do consider myself really lucky that my first love in life was actually play. I grew up before the technology boom and you know, we were in a subdivision with lots of kids and we were always outdoors after school playing sports and running around and stuff. And so naturally that flowed into a lifelong love of sports and activity for me.
David Fagan: And, you know, I’m not an expert in many things and it’s funny how the older you get, you kind of realize that, but I do know what I need for the algorithms that work for me. And, you know, I believe that you can get your personal flywheel spinning in either direction forward or backwards. And I just put a really high priority on keeping my flywheel spinning in the right direction.
David Fagan: Right? And, you know, no, I’m not perfect and I don’t hold myself to some ideal that I’ve, I’m a hundred percent compliant on my habits and stuff, but. If you can get some things consistently right, you know, maybe with an 80% confidence. That’s what I would say is a worthy habit. Right. And one of the first things that I ever shared with Clay when I joined the TIP mastermind community was that I lived a balanced life of work, family, exercise and spirit.
David Fagan: And I know without bias that I’m directionally correct with this. And you know, we often talk about financial compounding, but the same is true for our habits. They compound both the good ones and the bad ones. Right. And you know, so of course there’s some off days, there’s travel and family commitments and you know, stuff happens.
David Fagan: But you know, just to kind of drill down to my specific habits, and I know you’ve shared yours internally with our mastermind community, but I’ll just give you a quick rundown of some of my highest confidence habits, just to give you a little bit of kind of how I structure my day. I do wake up around six o’clock every morning.
David Fagan: I use that first hour of the day to journal, read and write. You know, we’re fortunate to have a beautiful home gym in our house. So I just walk downstairs at 7:00 AM and I’m working out for 30 to 40 minutes and I drink a lot of water during that time. Eat a solid breakfast, and I get to my desk around eight 15.
David Fagan: And you know, on a side note, Mr. Warren Buffettt and I do have one thing in common, and probably the only thing we’ll ever have in common is that we both have a five minute drive to the office. And so for me that’s worth its weight in gold. You know, I don’t take for granted the infrastructure that I enjoy.
David Fagan: Right. And that’s also part of your flywheel, right? Is how you can structure things properly and, you know, naturally getting up at six in the morning, I’m to bed around 10 30 or so most nights. And. Honestly, I think sleeping well can be a superpower in life. And, you know, that is a habit in itself and I try to optimize for it.
David Fagan: And, you know, I’m probably boring the listeners right now because this is like kind of basic simple stuff, but that’s kind of the point of it really. I mean, I optimize for sleeping well. I exercise every day. I eat healthy enough so that when I don’t eat healthy, I don’t even think about it. And, you know, I try to do something for my spirit every day.
David Fagan: And that’s the one that’s been probably the toughest for me to build an algorithm around. You know, it’s taken me a long time to kind of get that one right. But, you know, now for a bunch of years now I’ve been meditating around two 30 in the afternoon for about 20 minutes and. When I get that right, I come out of that meditation and I feel like I’ve started a brand new day.
David Fagan: And for me it’s like warping time. It kind of resets me and it reshapes the rest of my afternoon. And you know, by no means am I going to claim to be an expert in meditation, it’s still very much a work in progress for me. But when I do settle in and get it right it’s wonderful. Right. And, you know, and here into my mid-forties, you know, the big thing I’ve learned that it’s never just one or two habits that make a difference.
David Fagan: It’s really the aggregation of all your habits. And no, you don’t want to become a robot, but you do want to be di directionally correct with your consistency. And just like running a business, you know, consistency can create winners and I think it’s important, right? And so for me, I’m always just trying to strive for balance in, in that regard.
Stig Brodersen: That is absolutely amazing. David. I wish I had that discipline. You know, one of the one of the community members and a good friend of mine Thomas, he once said to me, if you don’t waste hours, you’re going to waste years. And I found that to be extremely helpful, partly because I sometimes need an excuse for being efficient.
Stig Brodersen: So it’s sort of like a way of saying, oh my God, this probably, ’cause I’m not going to waste years. But I do think that Thomas is right, that you want to avoid being in a negative spiral where you’re so busy that you don’t have time to question you. You spend your time the right way. And so one way I would go about this is I would.
Stig Brodersen: I’ll go for a walk. I think some people generously call it walking meditation. I don’t necessarily know if I’m on that level, but there is something to be said about going home or walking home from work. And I should say that I don’t have a five minute drive like you, David. I have a five second walk from my bedroom to my office.
Stig Brodersen: So after I’m done with the day, I actually go for a walk, sort of like to walk home from work because then I feel I’m, I can be a better version of myself and a better husband. And I got to be present because otherwise there’s just your business going on in my head. So I go for a walk just short of an hour after work.
Stig Brodersen: So going back home from work and reflecting on what did I achieve that day? What should I achieve tomorrow? Stop planning the day for tomorrow and type that up. And so it, it’s a little counterintuitive, but you need to have time not to be efficient, to give yourself an overview, to be efficient and. You know, a successful habit that I would like to explore a bit here together with you David, is the, this idea of surrounding yourself with people who are smarter than you because you, you become the average of the five people you surround yourself with.
Stig Brodersen: And of course it’s a little bit tricky, you know, whenever you say like, what is smart? Could you define smart? And all of a sudden, I kind of feel like I’ll be painting myself into a corner. But, you know, we have Ralph for our, from our community, ’cause we talked about this together and he said that I think he, he called it like a high caliber person or low caliber person.
Stig Brodersen: And so perhaps that’s a bit more inclusive than saying just smart. But I think that perhaps some of the listeners, or perhaps all the listeners can resonate with that. You meet a person and then for whatever reason you’re like, Ooh, that’s a high caliber person, or that’s a low frequency person because of what they’re say and what they do.
Stig Brodersen: And so if I, ’cause I have this excessive need to be very quantitative, so, so my apologies. If we say that we then assign a value from one to 10, like what’s the caliber of that person? So if you’re an eight, you want to surround yourself with people who are nine. If you’re nine, you want to find people who are 10.
Stig Brodersen: But then I don’t even know if we can agree on the numbers, but then we also run into this issue that we run out of numbers. What do you do whenever you’re 10 or whatever. I never had that problem. But how do you think about this idea, David, of surrounding yourself with higher caliber people than yourselves and how does the math add up?
David Fagan: That’s quite a thought experiment, stink. I’m going to digress just for a minute that you mentioned of, this made me think of a Black Mirror episode that I watched on Netflix. Everyone’s personality was rated in a public rating system and their mark was a listed above their head and people were constantly trying to move up and improve their scores and their social rankings.
David Fagan: And needless to say, it didn’t really work out well for the main character in that episode, but. To your point though, like this past April during one of these mastermind accountability calls that we were TA that I was talking about earlier, we had a conversation about this very idea that you’re the product of the five people that you spend the most time with.
David Fagan: And we also talked about actively seeking mentorship, which sounds simple on paper, but it can be hard to put in practice sometimes. You know, it’s not easy, it’s not always easy to seek out mentors who can help you. Right? And you know, in fact, you know, some of the traits that actually make you a successful entrepreneur, that determination and the grit, and maybe even call it stubbornness, sometimes that can actually block you from seeking out mentorships sometimes.
David Fagan: And you know, a lot of founders, whether they’re running a small business or building something much larger. Sometimes they start out with that deep drive for independence and the, I’ll figure it out myself, mindset that kind of fuels their early success. But I feel like that can also create some blind spots.
David Fagan: So, you know, looking back and thinking back to that call that we had, I think many of us don’t sync out mentorship early enough because, you know, maybe we’re too busy just trying to prove that we can kind of do it on our own, you know, but, and it really, everyone’s experience was obviously different.
David Fagan: That’s what kind of stood out on the call that there was about 10 of us or so that were on that call. And, you know, some felt it was easier in larger organizations where mentorship is kind of baked into the structure to kind of have the, a formalized relationship there. And, you know, others on the call talked about never having a formal mentor mentee relationship at all.
David Fagan: And actually one of the members even brought up AI as, as a mentor. And you know, that, you know, asking life questions, getting perspectives and reflecting through dialogue with like, chat GPT and you know, I know that’s going to be, that’s probably a topic for another day, but it’s fascinating and there’s some emerging research on this.
David Fagan: I read a book recently called Co-Intelligence by Ethan Mollick, and in it he talks about AI as a coach to kind of help you think about and reflect and grow. And I thought it was pretty fascinating and, you know, I guess maybe we won’t go down that rabbit hole today, but it is interesting this gentleman on the call that, that was talking about how he used it.
David Fagan: So, you know, and I. Partly to your point too, on kind of the grading system and trying to figure stuff out. You know, I think the other thing to consider about mentorship is and surrounding yourself with people that are smarter than you, like, that doesn’t actually come naturally to everyone right away.
David Fagan: You know, I think you have to kind of learn it because you do have to fight imposter syndrome a little bit, and you kind of have to get comfortable being uncomfortable when you’re putting yourself in new situations. But, you know, when you hear someone like Christopher Begg talk with William and their latest episode together about how his network of friends has become a superpower in his life, I mean, it definitely inspires you to kind of seek out this level of coordination.
Stig Brodersen: Yeah. I think that you bring up some great points and a very interesting point about ai. It’s like I feel a discussion about how to use. Chatt or whatnot as a mentor might already be outdated whenever we’re going to publish this. I, it is, it’s just like, yeah, I don’t know how I use ChatGPT for everything these days.
Stig Brodersen: And it seems like it’s getting better every week. Not every month now, like every week. It’s absolutely amazing. You know, in, in terms of I, I once had a, like, formal mentorship whenever I was a graduate. It was extremely helpful for me and it played a big role in like changing jobs.
Stig Brodersen: And so for me it was very valuable. And then, you know, I, like so many others probably listening to the show, I had, you know, buffet and Monga then they don’t know exists. But you know, it’s like informal mentors because, you know, you read everything that they have said and done and you have an idea of what they would do in the situation.
Stig Brodersen: So to me that’s been immensely helpful too. I want to talk a bit here about friendships and probably not on the node of grading people. I don’t necessarily, I kind of feel it. My example came across a bit more transactional probably than I wanted it. But my point is about friendships, is that it, I think that I’ve become a bit more pragmatic because I used to think that it was better to have friends from the time whenever you grew up because there were more pure friendships.
Stig Brodersen: And I’ll be the first to say, if you do have that I think it’s wonderful. So, so please don’t get me wrong as I’m going to say something different here perhaps, or it’s going to sound different. I also think it really depends on what kind of friendships and relationship you want to have.
Stig Brodersen: And so let me give you a mental model here. So say that you are a footballer and you want to play at the best team in the world. Say you want to play for Liverpool fc. I refuse to say PSG for anyone listening to the show and 99% people have no clue why I would refer PSG and what we’re talking about, that it’s not the best team in the world anyways.
Stig Brodersen: What are the odds that Liverpool is going to win the next chairman’s league only with local players? It’s just, it just won’t happen, at least not the way football is today. And so you need to look outside of your local pond to, to compete on the board class level. And I, I’m not saying that we all compete on cha league championship kind level, but I think it’s an interesting mental model where there is something to be said about friendships and loyalty.
Stig Brodersen: And I think loyalty is great, but you have to be loyal to another person for the right reason. And because it has to be, it has to be mutual beneficial and most relationships in life are there for reason or season. And not for a lifetime. And I would just encourage people to think that’s perfectly fine.
Stig Brodersen: And whenever I say mutual beneficial, I’m not talking about it from a money changing hands kind of way, but from whenever you meet up with your friends, you should both leave with this positive energy and looking forward to seeing your friend again and not feel like, oh, I just checked off a box of, oh, I’m so grounded, and I hang out with my, you know, the kids from the block whenever I grew up.
Stig Brodersen: And so now, you know, I’ve reset the counter to zero, and then I, in another month from now, I’m going to reset the calendar again. Even if you haven’t enjoyed it, they haven’t enjoyed it because you feel that there’s some kind of moral obligation to do so. Believe me, I’m made the mistake myself. So that’s why I’m saying this and so it sounds beautiful to have the same friends throughout your lifetime but let me give you another perspective.
Stig Brodersen: Life is like a long train ride. Like you stop from time to pick up different passengers who want to be part of your journey, and then sometimes you also stop and some of those people jump off. And it’s not because of a fallout could be, but most, most often it’s not because of a fallout, it’s just you’re no longer on the same journey.
Stig Brodersen: Perhaps you chose a different journey. Perhaps your friend wanted to be on another train, and that’s perfectly fine because you know the best things in lives come from compounding. And if you are lucky enough to find someone who wants to be part of your journey through life, that’s amazing. And if not, that’s also kind of fine. So anyways, it, to me, that has been very helpful to think about friendships that way.
David Fagan: Yeah. Friends for a reason, a season and a lifetime. That’s definitely a mental model that people can grab onto. As you know, Stig, my wife and I have been together for a very long time, almost 30 years. And of course we’re not the same people at 46 is, we are at 16 and you know, but the one thing we’ve managed to get right.
David Fagan: And it’s kind of helped us weather all the natural up and downs in, in any relationship is that we’ve grown together roughly the same times and the same pace in life. And you know, as you mature, you start to understand yourself so much better. And I think it’s that deeper understanding that you do want to surround yourself by people who are congruent with your values in your life.
David Fagan: And, you know, sometimes that can be your childhood friends and business associates. And maybe sometimes it may not be. I mean, it’s a little bit like your train analogy. You know, we’re all kind of moving around and eventually we meet up with people that are in sync in the direction that we’re going.
David Fagan: Right? And you know, if we rewind back to where we started off this podcast about being a better business owner makes you a better investor and vice versa. Well, another trait for both of those realms is the desire to be a continuous learner. And so. When you’ve committed to continuous learning, naturally you’re going to grow and you’re going to probably want to connect with people that are on kind of that same path with you.
David Fagan: Right. And yeah, maybe a bit of a side note stick, but as I think when we get, as when we get older, I think being a little less competitive can actually be a good thing as well. And that will actually open the door for connections with people. And I’ll give you a little bit of a backstory for this. I mean, when I was in my twenties, when someone new would show up to play basketball with our men’s group, you know, I’d always make sure I stepped up to my game and I went at them really hard and as hard as I could.
David Fagan: And surprise, that didn’t really win me many friends. And you know, it wasn’t really until I moved away and found myself as the new guy in another men’s group that I realized just how bad that energy was. And. Let me be clear. Men’s basketball in rural Nova Scotia, it wouldn’t even qualify for the G League halftime show.
David Fagan: So what I was really doing was blocking potential relationships with like-minded people because of ego. Right. And to be honest, I probably carried some of that mentality into my early business career, that sense of competitiveness. I mean, it’s great for some things, but it could actually cost you as well.
David Fagan: And you know, looking, when I look back and kind of reflect, it probably did cost me some mental energy that I could have used elsewhere and maybe even a few meaningful relationships with like-minded people. Right. And so, you know, as I’ve gotten older, I’ve tried to really think about being a little more vulnerable in, in life and kind of that shift away from always needing to win, to kind of slowing down and listening a bit more and being vulnerable. It’s been interesting to see kind of how it’s played out.
Stig Brodersen: David, I’m going to put you on the spot here, I can’t help myself and I’m going to reference a bunch of different calls we had people didn’t tune into. So it’s kind of like unfair. But I do remember we had a call where we talked about financial independence and one thing that stuck with the, was that you said that once you reach your financial goals, it’s really all about your why.
Stig Brodersen: And I just think it was such a brilliant observation and I always I think I’ve said that multiple times here on the show. It’s been such a big part of my journey and like I just burning wanted to become financial independent and that feeling and achieving that feeling and the opportunities and so on and so forth.
Stig Brodersen: But it also brings you a myriad of different questions you never had before. Like I, I was probably naive is, I’m probably still naive, but I remember thinking whenever I hit this number. I’m never going to have a care in the world anymore. Like of course the world isn’t that kind. Like you hit a certain number and you have different problems.
Stig Brodersen: It’s just the name of the game. And you know, I feel I’ve been on this journey with different friends. This was actually something we talked about here before, before we hit record, where, you know, you, you meet old friends, new friends on this path to financial independence, and it’s just very interesting to see what happens to yourself, but also to other people whenever they achieve whatever their number is, most people they lose their drive.
Stig Brodersen: They set a goal, they achieve it, and then they stop and they say, you only have one life. Why spend it on working if you don’t need to? And of course then you also have other people who say, you only have one life, so why wouldn’t you spend doing that and changing the world, or at least your own small pocket of the world.
Stig Brodersen: And there’s a self-selection there of course, because whenever you achieve a financial independence on certain age, it’s typically ’cause you have that competitive side of you. It’s fun to compete, it’s fun to win. And most people are just not smart enough to compete in such a brutal world of capitalism and do that part-time.
Stig Brodersen: And then you have this thing where even if they can’t, like they perhaps don’t signal the right thing to their team, oh, I’m just doing this part-time, but you are supposed to do this full-time. It’s like, ah, there are a lot of different threats we can pull from this. David, so the thing, I want to throw it over to you and sort of like here, what is your why? Let’s start with that.
David Fagan: That’s a big question. I’ll see if I can. Get this narrowed in. I mean, there are, there’s so many different paths to financial independence, right? And you know, when you’re working towards it, it can feel like a destination. But if you love the game of business and investing, and Stig, I’ve heard you say this many times, your natural state is always thinking about wealth creation, right?
David Fagan: And so I think when you become financially independent, it’s only prudent to ask yourself why. You know, what is it all for? You know? I was listening to your recent conversation with Mohnish, which aired during the Berkshire weekend, and he shared in that episode that he was financially independent at 34 years old.
David Fagan: And like so many of the greats in business and investing world, I mean, building wealth, past financial independence. That really isn’t the goal. It’s just a byproduct of what they love to do. Right. And so when you’ve reached that stage, I think it’s important to ask yourself what comes next? Right. And, you know, while I’ve reached financial independence myself, I’m certainly not a steward of, you know, significant wealth.
David Fagan: But I do think about what that stewardship would look like in the future. How would I manage it? What kind of legacy would I want to leave behind? And, you know, there’s a mental model that I think about often. It’s unearned and unlearned wealth can be dangerous for others. And so just to create wealth, just to leave it to the next generation without preparing them for the responsibility of managing that, sometimes that can do more harm than good.
David Fagan: And unfortunately, I’ve seen that situation where there’s been a generational shift in wealth and it’s been a burden more so than an asset. So, you know, I think, you know. Probably going in circles here a little bit, but to actually answer your question on my why I love to work, maybe it’s the accountant in me.
David Fagan: You know, I’ve been in public practice for 25 years and I’m kind of wired a bit for productivity and I like working. I like, especially when it’s creative and value driven. And so I need to structure in my life to support this rhythm and, you know, not in a way that burns me out, but in a way that, you know, most days feel like play, right?
David Fagan: And you know, yes, there’s some hard days, but you want to be directionally correct with that. And so there’s a Japanese term that I really connect with, and it’s called AKI Guy. And it’s the intersection of what you love, what you’re good at, what the world needs, and what you can be financially rewarded for.
David Fagan: And in my own small way, I actually use this framework to help focus my why. I love to lead by example. You know, I wouldn’t ask anyone to do something that I wouldn’t do myself. I like to teach others about wealth creation and what good financial habits can do, especially when someone’s starting off with a zero balance in life.
David Fagan: You know, that really gets me excited and I’m deeply rooted in the Canadian small business world. You know, helping people understand how to execute their business structures and corporate and personal tax planning, and how to build their own path towards financial independence. So, you know, over the past two decades I’ve worked with hundreds of clients and the clients and I’ve, that I’ve been able to lead them on their path to prosperity.
David Fagan: Those are the relationships that have given me the most satisfaction in my career. And, you know, really in a nutshell that’s my why.
Stig Brodersen: Thank you for sharing, David. And I think it’s very different from person to person what the why is. And what I would encourage you to, not necessarily you David but, ’cause I think it sounds like you, you got it covered, but if there was something to clone from the audience and it sounds very generic.
Stig Brodersen: It probably is, but I would like to peel a few different layers on that. I often get asked for advice which is of course wonderful. It’s also a little ironic to say that no one’s a prophet in his own country. And I couldn’t imagine people be more unimpressed by the type of advice I give than my family.
Stig Brodersen: So whenever I get the escort advice, it’s always wonderful. People think I have something to contribute, but I more or less always say the same thing, which is I don’t know what with decision is right for you, but it has to be aligned with your values. And so some people would probably look at the way you structured your life at David and say, okay, six o’clock in the morning, and then, you know, and then the exercise and you want to read and you want to do, and they’re like, oh my God, it sounds so stressful.
Stig Brodersen: Well, I think but it’s the right mix for you because that is the way you want to live your life. And everyone loves Buffett, right? But then the hardcore value investors that generally tend to like monger more than buffet. And one, one quote that’s getting thrown around a lot is, you know, this monger quote of, I’m going to butcher it completely, but like, trading small pieces of paper is a wasted life.
Stig Brodersen: And so I think a lot of people resonate with, you know, the breadth of monger. And I think that’s absolutely wonderful. And then the look at Buffett is like, ah, didn’t he really, like, shouldn’t he be spending more time with his kids or isn’t he too much of a one stringing banjo just sitting there reading 10 Ks and Moody’s and whatever?
Stig Brodersen: And I don’t necessarily think I need to defend Buffett, so, so please don’t get me wrong. Again, he have no clue who I am. I don’t think Buffett wakes up in the morning and thinks, oh my God, if only I was as interested in architecture like my friend Charlie. Or if I would build my own boat, like I don’t think he wakes up thinking like it.
Stig Brodersen: I think he’s 100% aligned with his inner scorecard, living a life that’s true to his values. And so whenever I get asked for advice. And also why I ask you David, about your wise, it goes back to this idea of how are you aligned with your values? And if I don’t know your values, I can’t tell you what to do, but like that’s key here.
Stig Brodersen: And it’s probably quite easy to look at different successful people and then say, oh, you know, this person, you know, there’s probably also an element of sour grapes there. Like, ah, yeah, but you know, he doesn’t live a good life like I do because, well, perhaps you’re right. Perhaps that is a deeply broken, terrible person or perhaps that person just have different values than you, not because he’s not enlightened enough or not just because, like, no, he’s just wide, a little bit different than you.
Stig Brodersen: And that’s why he’s still super happy living a different life than you. And so it’s going to sound a bit like a cliche. One point in time I’m going to try to start a sentence without saying, it’s going to sound like a cliche, but it didn’t happen this time, David. But I look at this through the lens of optimizing for happiness, which I think we all do to, to at large extent, even though we might not think about it like that.
Stig Brodersen: And, you know, some people would say, oh I work hard to make sure I can give my kids, I don’t know, $10 million, you know, at the time I’m not here. Or they might say, I’m doing this, and then I make sure to give all the money away because I don’t want my, I don’t want to spoil my kids. Or perhaps Buffett said it best when he talks about giving his kids enough money to do anything but not nothing.
Stig Brodersen: And so the idea of optimizing for happiness is also why, you know, I would have friends who say, I reached my number, why would I ever work? And why I have other friends who say, I have so much money, so why wouldn’t I continue working? This is so much fun. It’s all part of the idea of optimizing for happiness.
Stig Brodersen: And so a big part of my why. I really enjoy being on this metaphorical journey with wonderful people. And so, you know, we get wonderful applications for, from people who have been listening to the show in college, and then they right out of a very nice Ivy League school, they want to join CIP.
Stig Brodersen: And I’ve always said, no. We, I, as your officer say, we didn’t have a professor from Howard who wanted to join the team, but I believe that all good things in life come from compounding. And the same goes from relationships. So, you know, whenever I hired Claire or Kyle, you know, I hope they would stay with CIP for at least a decade and way longer.
Stig Brodersen: It was the same thing whenever, you know, William joined the team. And I know that the world isn’t always that kind, that you’re not going to work for decades. Wonderful people always. But that is the mindset. I go into my why with, from the professional and from the personal side. And so William taught me this wonderful.
Stig Brodersen: Mental, a model of don’t work with friends before you are 40 and then only work with friends after you’re 40. And I think that there is, like, everything at Williams says there’s a, an element of wisdom there. A huge element of wisdom there. And so that is just something that financial independence allows you to do. How do you look at that framework, David?
David Fagan: Yeah, sure. It’s funny how we use dates and milestones to kind of anchor wholesale changes in our lives. I, you know, Daniel Pink actually talks about this in a book that he wrote about when, you know, the secrets of perfect timing. And I guess maybe it’s no surprise stick that you’re thinking about this ’cause you just turned 40, right?
David Fagan: And you know, you’re maybe reflecting through that lens. So a couple things to unpack here. First, the notion of not working with friends before 40. I feel like that’s almost the opposite of how things work in smaller communities. I mean, in many cases. Those early personal relationships that you have are the ones that open up the doors for opportunities for you in the first place.
David Fagan: Right. But eventually, I think what we really want to do is kind of build aligned relationships with people, right? And, you know, we want to work with people who we can build a high degree of confidence with. And, you know, that can only be built from trust and from time. Right? And, you know, trust is a form of compounding.
David Fagan: Like, like you said, like we wonderful relationships and like anything that compounds it, you can’t rush it. And you know, like most people have probably likely heard of the concept of the trust bank. You know, you build it up by showing up and keeping commitments and hitting milestones together. But on the flip side, you know, if you’re missing expectations and brushing off priorities or more serious missteps, I mean, those are withdrawals and they can cost you and.
David Fagan: That’s why, you know, listening to what you said Stig about wanting to work with Clay and Kyle for a really long time like that’s wonderful. Right. You know, it’s like little, small consistent steps that you can kind of build sustaining trust with over time. I mean, that sounds like a wonderful recipe for success.
David Fagan: Right. And I’m sure you apply that with many relationships that you have at TIP and among other people. And just to give you a little bit of personal context on this, my business partner James Allen, joined me back in 2017 and he had just moved back to the area. And, you know, we had worked on a few small engagements together while he was with another accounting firm.
David Fagan: And we didn’t really know each other that well at the start, but we had just enough clarity to believe that we were on track in forming our partnership. Right. And now, eight years later. Going into our ninth year. So, you know, getting close to that decade of work together, I can confidently say that we’re far better friends and business partners today than when we started, and we’re starting to see the compounding effects of our partnership.
David Fagan: And, you know, we’ve been battle tested too, which can deepen your relationship. I mean, there was a 24 month period that tested us more than anything. I mean, we had to send our entire staff home during COVID. We had to rehaul our systems to allow that to happen. We were building a new office right in the middle of the pandemic, and we were also dealing with a significant client tax issue that had the potential to go sideways.
David Fagan: Right? And, you know, fortunately everything worked out and everything was fine. But it’s in those moments that you want to make sure you’re surrounded by the right people. And I can remember telling James. I remember the day I told him, I was like, nothing we’re going to face together will be more challenging than what we just went through.
David Fagan: And we both knew it. We came out on the other side and we had a deeper understanding for each other. Right. And, you know, just like a long marriage, you’re going to go through your ups and downs. And probably Dalio said it best when he was like, pain plus reflection equals progress. Right? And so, but when you go through those moments with someone else and you actually get it right, it doesn’t just make you stronger individually. It can really fortify your relationships with people.
Stig Brodersen: You know, I’m very happy that you say that, David, you, I kind of feel like I’m a one stringing ban with quote after quote of quote. But like, you can have anything but not everything. Right? And so. If you want to achieve something really valuable in relationships, it’s not, I mean, like any wonderful relationship, they’re going to be ups and downs, hopefully a lot more ops than Downs.
Stig Brodersen: But it, it’s a packet steal. And I feel that with myself. I see that with friends where a certain stages of your life you become a bit more complacent and there are different type of pain, you’re just not willing to do anymore. Some of it’s probably good, but you can’t really, the things in life that you want to do, even if you don’t need the money, still come with some pain.
Stig Brodersen: You know? If you run if you want to run a successful business, there are going to be different friction and different things you want to be without. And if you opt out and say, I just don’t want those problems, then you can’t run a business. And it’s like, it just, it’s just that simple.
Stig Brodersen: You can’t only have all the good stuff and then something comes in for left field. And I know like it’s, it, the situation for you guys, of course is, was a little bit different because you, you have an actual office and you know, we’re small company with, you know, 20 people and it’s all virtual and so on.
Stig Brodersen: So it’s a little bit different for us. But we didn’t have a protocol that said, in case of the world shutting down due to a pandemic, this is what you do. Here are the 12 steps. One about we didn’t have that protocol. So we had to figure that out. So I wanted to go back to this framework here of partnering up and partnering up.
Stig Brodersen: It could be an equity, it could be a 50 50 partnership and a partnership, but whatever it might be. Could also be you employer, you are being an employer and hiring employee, whatever it is. I look at it as an alliance. I look at it as a partnership. And so one of the things that I’ve learned as I’ve gotten a little older has been always to look at the track record of that person.
Stig Brodersen: Success leaves clues. And of course this is a little bit different if you’re hiring someone right out of college or if you’re teaming is up with someone who’s 60. That of course there are different type of clues you’re looking for. But one example that is top of mind is a good friend I have who at the time in his forties wanted to run a company and he was looking for a business partner.
Stig Brodersen: And one of the things I said to him was that he should find a business partner who should put money down to, into the partnership. And my friend was like, looking and be like, we don’t really need the cash. So like, why would I do it? Well, you know, it’s like you want to make sure that he’s committed.
Stig Brodersen: That’s point number one. But there are also different kind of signal into it. And so it wasn’t I don’t know I don’t know if I’m going offended in one here, but I don’t remember it as a big commitment. It was in the $40,000 range. Of course, you know, we all come from different walks of life and to some people, and 40,000 is a lot of people.
Stig Brodersen: But I would imagine here if you’re looking for a business partner in Denmark and it’s in the $40,000 range and he was looking at candidates in their forties and fifties, it’s not a lot of money. And so if the person doesn’t forge up that money, like there are different reasons for it, right?
Stig Brodersen: Like one of them is the person has the money but doesn’t believe in the company, probably don’t want to partner up with him, or he really believes in the company, but he doesn’t, he hasn’t accumulated $40,000 then that’s probably also the wrong person to, to team up with. And so what ended up happening was that he got an exemption for the $40,000 and he turned out to be a terrible business partner.
Stig Brodersen: And there were still different issues and there were legal actions and it was just absolutely terrible. And so, of course, this is just an anecdote, but to me, I think that there were some things that is somewhat evergreen there. And then I would also say that. Don’t team up with your friends because they’re your friends.
Stig Brodersen: I have some wonderful friends I would never go into business with because I’m quite sure we will not be friends if we did that. So, so please don’t get me wrong, whenever I’m making those observations. Another observation I wanted to share here with the audience is that if you want a lot out of life and business, you have to ask for it.
Stig Brodersen: Don’t ask for everything though, because if you ask everything, you end up with nothing. But if you like David and me and you like your love working, why not work with friends? And it’s probably going to sound a little spoiled, but I don’t want to be one of those guys to say that I don’t have time for my friends because I’ve worked too much.
Stig Brodersen: And I’m like, I love working. I love my friends. Can we get the best of both worlds? And so, of course, make sure it’s for the right reason. But I probably, one thing I would say is that people do change. Yes, but they don’t change because you want them to change or at the pace you want them to change.
Stig Brodersen: Like, it goes to David’s point before about a partnership is like a marriage. Like, like, and no, I can say I’ve a married almost 15 years. Like, your wife is not going to change because you want to change and you are not going to change because your wife wants you to change. Like, it just doesn’t work like that.
Stig Brodersen: And so you need to, like every good marriage, you need to be respectful. You need to listen, you know how, you need to know how to pick your battles. And one mental model I would like to share with the audience is that be ready to give in. Like every time I work with someone I give in a lot, probably nine out of 10 times.
Stig Brodersen: And of course whenever you have that approach, you also need to make sure that you partner up with high caliber people who don’t exploit it. But you know, there are different ways you can identify those people. But I want to give you three scenarios here. Why do I give in so much whenever I work with other people?
Stig Brodersen: If we have different opinion, well, your partner’s idea might be better than yours. That is definitely possible, especially in my case. It could also be that your ideas are equally good, but if it’s your partner who are executing on it and their ideas equally good, I can guarantee you that you should follow your partner’s idea because he’s after all the guy executing.
Stig Brodersen: And then there’s also the situation where your idea is still better, but then your partner still has to execute it. So if it’s only a little bit better, you’re going to get up with a better result for both of you if you give in. And then of course you have this one out of 10 times where you just have such a high conviction that you are right.
Stig Brodersen: And then if you find the right caliber of business partner, you know that he’s going to, or she’s going to disagree and commit. And that’s really where you are being tested. And if you find the right person, that is exactly what’s going to happen.
David Fagan: Leadership and relationships, they can be complicated, can’t they? Right. If you want someone to take real ownership of their work, and sometimes, you know, you just have to sprinkle a little bit of pixie dust and then you need to step back and just let them own it, right? And yes, it might not be a hundred percent of the way that you would’ve had it done, but if it’s 80% as quote unquote as good as you imagined it, well that’s still a hundred percent on something you didn’t have to execute on.
David Fagan: And to me, that’s actually worth a lot. Right. And you know, another thing to kind of unpack here a bit too, Stig, is you brought up a great point about going into business with someone who maybe hasn’t organized their financial life. That’s a huge red flag. It, you know, it’s like watching a fitness coach who doesn’t work out.
David Fagan: You know, most exercise leaders, they can kind of, they’re the ones that there developing the content. They can perform the movements themselves. I mean, you’ve got to be an exemplar of the lifestyle that you’re promoting, right? So. You know, if you’re considering going into business with and partnering up with someone and maybe they’ve never saved or they’re living beyond their means, or maybe they don’t understand how leverage works or one of my personal favors, maybe they haven’t filed their tax return in three in four years.
David Fagan: I mean, there’s no debate. You’ve got to make an automatic not there when you’re developing these relationships and roles and responsibilities. Right. And as we talked about earlier, I mean, our habits both good and bad. They’re super strong and you know, it’s not surprising that your friend had a rough experience.
David Fagan: Right. Trying to do that. Like you said, I mean, people aren’t going to change for you, they have to come to the conclusion that they’re going to change themselves. Right. You know, I think what makes it easier for anyone to team up later in life with someone isn’t that you know them so much better, it’s that you actually know yourself a lot better and you know what you need in, in a relationship to make it successful.
David Fagan: Right. And I think that awareness helps you clearly recognize what you’re looking for in others, and then, you know, kind of divvying up roles and responsibilities and all of that stuff. So, you know, on a slightly different line of thinking, but on the topic of working with others, I mean, one of the models that we use at our firm is helping people find their superpower, right?
David Fagan: I, we want to discover what makes someone tick, you know, what they love to do. And we want to help move people from what feels like a job to something that feels like fulfillment, right? And it’s kind of like. Letting your winners ride in your portfolio. I mean, if a person is really good at something and they love it, you don’t want to interrupt it, you just want to give them more of it and you want to let it grow.
David Fagan: Right. And you know, I often say that you love your kids for different reasons. I mean, you love them for what makes ’em special, not because they’re the same. Right. And I think that same mindset is great for leadership and you know, finding each person’s superpower. If you can find each person’s superpower, feed them a lot of it and let them thrive, that’s going to be fantastic.
David Fagan: I mean, you know, of course it sounds great on paper, you don’t always get it right. And you know, to be honest, I still sometimes wrestle with the idea of building integrated teams with different personalities and stuff. And so leadership can be really tough. Right. And you know, as your network grows with people that you’re connected with and stuff, and.
David Fagan: Some of the leadership philosophies out there say you, you need a divi, a diverse mix of people to cross balanced perspectives within your organization. And, you know, but in a highly systemized world like accounting you know, in our own business we’ve got about 25 people or so. You know, I’ve found that bringing in someone who’s overly free spirited and non-routine can create some real challenges.
David Fagan: So, you know, I, you know, Stig, our teams are actually very similar in size. So I’ll throw this back to you. I mean, have you ever thought about hiring someone who you know is great, but who just operates completely different than the rest of the team?
Stig Brodersen: Yeah. We have one of those, his name is William
David Fagan: I knew you were going to say that one.
Stig Brodersen: But that’s been absolutely wonderful. And you know, it, I don’t think that there is any. I don’t think there, there is like a one size fits all type solution to that. I think it’s very important that you have the same values though. You still need to have the same values. Even if you operate very differently, if you don’t have the same values, it’s going to be tricky.
Stig Brodersen: And luckily William has the same values, so it’s not difficult at all. It really depends on what kind of life you want to live. We have a, it sounds absolutely terrible because all companies of course, have a culture and all so many companies feel that they have an amazing culture. And then perhaps that’s not the case.
Stig Brodersen: And whenever you speak to the founder, sometimes they talk about a culture being better than perhaps other people in the organization. You know, one thing that’s very telling of our culture is that what people see is the hosts. And we have obviously way more people than we have hosts on the show, but like the show or the host get all the attention.
Stig Brodersen: And so it’s very important to have a culture. At least it is for me where we don’t work with big egos because it’s just not fun. And then it also depends on what is it that you’re optimizing for. So if we were optimizing purely for dollars, there have been different situations in the lifetime of TAP where we could have worked with some high profile names and gone a route that’s quite different than what we’re doing today.
Stig Brodersen: And we could have built up some franchises around different people and you know, if we optimize for money, that is probably the way to go. But then it would erode the culture and we optimize for a wonderful culture. And so we do different things on the team that’s absolutely ridiculous. From a profit maximization standpoint.
Stig Brodersen: Like one of, one of the things we do, for example, is that we have the support team rate the host from a scale from one to five. And then we literally have a company handbook where it talks about if the hosts are not nice to work with, you know, they can’t be a part of the team. We don’t have that for our support team.
Stig Brodersen: We probably should have, but we don’t have that. And I would also say we probably don’t need that because the people who are, who seek a job as in, in support are just wired a little bit different than, you know, whenever we would open up, you know, for Clay’s position we got like a hundred applicants.
Stig Brodersen: A lot of people want to be, you know, minus cyber value investing space and be paid to do the hobby. So like, it requires a very special personality such as clay to, to stay grounded and stay humble when a lot of things are happening around you. I kind of feel like I, I was trying to avoid saying a lot of different things there in what I said before, but it’s really important.
Stig Brodersen: And so, so to answer your question and not just in the cheeky way of saying yeah, we have one of those, his name is William. I think it very much depends on what is it that you’re optimizing for and you just, you have to be aligned with those values and then the rest would take care of itself.
David Fagan: I mean, that’s wonderful. Sounds like you’re optimizing for the macro level. You know, if you can be directionally correct with values, culture, yeah. You can certainly merge in a lot of the other characteristics of the people that you work with. Yeah. But you’ve got to be at the macro level. You’ve got to be correct and aligned, like you said.
Stig Brodersen: David, this has been absolutely amazing. Thank you so much for making time for us, and not just on the podcast, but you know, also spending time with us and the mastermind community and teaching us about accountability and habits. Where can the audience learn more about you and do you have any concurrent remarks?
David Fagan: Yeah, I just want to say thank you so much for the opportunity to chat with you today, Stig. It means a lot. You’ve given me lots of opportunities within the community. I want to thank Kyle and Clay for their hard work, organizing the community, and just a shout out to the other members that I’ve connected with in the past and the future.
David Fagan: I’ll just leave it at that. I don’t need any personal shout notes for my for my rural accounting firm in Nova Scotia. So I just want to say thanks.
Stig Brodersen: Thank you, Dave. What a way to end the episode. Alright. Thank you so much.
Outro: Thank you for listening to TIP. Make sure to follow. We Study Billionaires on your favorite podcast app and never miss out on episodes. To access our show notes, transcripts, or courses, go to theinvestorspodcast.com. This show is for entertainment purposes only. Before making any decision, consult professional. This show is copyrighted by The Investor’s podcast. Written permission must be granted before syndication or rebroadcasting.